Hirdetés

  2. Fórumok
  3. Lokál
  4. AMD CPU-k jövője - amit tudni vélünk

Hirdetés

100 000 érv a ReGalaxy mellett: Vásárolj Galaxy Z Fold7 I Z Flip7 vagy Galaxy S25 szériás készüléket, és régi mobilod felújítását 100 000 Ft-ig mi álljuk!

Új hozzászólás Aktív témák

  • #9016 S_x96x_S addikt S_x96x_S #9015
    Új Válasz #9016
    Új hozzászólás
    Összes hozzászólása itt Válaszok az összes hozzászólására itt Válaszok erre a hozzászólásra
    Privát üzenet küldése

    S_x96x_S

    addikt

    válasz S_x96x_S #9015 üzenetére

    Részletesebb magyarázattal:

    Questions & Answers - Antitrust: Commission re-imposes €376.36 million fine on Intel for anticompetitive practices in the market for computer chips
    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_23_4571

    """
    What are naked restrictions and why are they a serious infringement of competition law?
    As established in the 2009 Commission's decision, the naked restrictions consisted in certain payments made by Intel to computer manufacturers (i.e., HP, Acer and Lenovo) to halt or delay the launch of specific products containing competitors' x86 CPUs and to limit the sales channels available to these products. More specifically:

    - Between November 2002 and May 2005, Intel made payments to HP conditional upon HP selling business desktops based on the x86 CPUs of its competitor AMD (i) only to small- and medium-sized enterprises; (ii) only via direct distribution channels (rather than distributors); and (iii) on HP postponing the launch of its first AMD-based business desktop in Europe by 6 months.
    - Intel made payments to Acer conditional upon Acer postponing the launch of an AMD-based notebook from September 2003 to January 2004.
    - Intel made payments to Lenovo conditional upon Lenovo postponing the launch of AMD-based notebooks from June 2006 to the end of 2006.

    As a result of those restrictions, computer manufacturers halted, delayed or placed restrictions on the commercialisation of products based on a competitor's chipsets, which they had actively planned and for which there was consumer demand. Intel's naked restrictions therefore had a detrimental effect on competition in the market, by depriving customers of a choice which they would have otherwise had.
    """

Új hozzászólás Aktív témák