Új hozzászólás Aktív témák

• #1635 krealon veterán margithid #1633

  Új Válasz 2015-02-13 23:31:53 #1635

  Új hozzászólás

  Összes hozzászólása itt Válaszok az összes hozzászólására itt Válaszok erre a hozzászólásra

  Privát üzenet küldése

  

  krealon

  veterán

  válasz margithid #1633 üzenetére

  Does a rewritten file on NTFS use the same blocks?

  "In general, block allocation is the most expensive operation in filesystems, so filesystems will try quite hard to avoid it, in particular by reusing blocks when possible. This would mean the following:

  When overwriting an existing file, the same blocks are reused. New blocks are allocated when the new file data exceeds that of the overwritten files.

  When truncating an existing file, all the blocks are released, thus potentially reusable for other file operations. In that case, the new file may allocate new blocks. There is no guarantee that the new file contents will reallocate the same blocks, and, in particular, the old blocks might have been reallocated to other files in the mean time.

  However, it depends a lot on the filesystem internals. Log-structured filesystems perform all writes sequentially, throughout the whole partition, so it is pretty much guaranteed, with such a filesystem, that the new file will not overwrite the blocks from the old file. Journaling filesystems may copy the file contents to an extra structure (the "journal") in addition to the actual permanent storage (depending on whether the journaling extends to the file contents, or just the metadata). Some filesystems also use a "phase tree" which can be viewed as a log-structured filesystem, with a tree instead of a list; for these, overwrites may or may not happen.

  An important point to consider is that block allocation strategies do not depend only on the filesystem, but also on the implementation. There is no guarantee that Windows XP and Windows 7, for instance, behave similarly on the same NTFS filesystem. One OS version may find it worthwhile to keep around old blocks to "speed up (re)allocation" while another could employ another strategy. This is all heuristics, tuned and retuned. Thus, one cannot really answer your question about "NTFS"; one would have to talk about "NTFS as implemented in OS foobar, version 42.17, build 3891"."

  Vagyis a naplozott fajlrendszer miatt, az uj fajlokat, lehetoleg korabban nem hasznalt blokkokra teszi a rendszer, igy a torolt fajlok az disk image-ben tovabbra is foglaljak a helyet. Ezert novekednek folyamatosan a virtualis gep disk-image fajljai.

• #1634 DrojDtroll veterán margithid #1633

  Új Válasz 2015-02-13 20:48:00 #1634

  Új hozzászólás

  Összes hozzászólása itt Válaszok az összes hozzászólására itt Válaszok erre a hozzászólásra

  Privát üzenet küldése

  

  DrojDtroll

  veterán

  válasz margithid #1633 üzenetére

  Nem lehet, hogy a lemezen sok a 10 gb helyen szét vannak szórva a file-ok és nem szépen sorban vannak? Nem tudom, hogy virtuális gépnél van-e ilyen.

Új hozzászólás Aktív témák