Hardware, speed
Windows Mobile 6.1 Professional, 200 MHz TI OMAP CPU, 128 MB RAM and 256 MB ROM, 75/138 MB being free of these – this is how the inside looks like in a nutshell. Touch had the same stuff, although its first edition half the memory as back then the OS was the WM 6, but we can still say that there’s no significant difference. We have benchmarked the speed at the preview, but we did it again due to the new ROM. Here are the results:
| Pocket PC Mark v1.03 | VsBenchmark 2007 | ||
| Dhrystone Benchmark (CPU) | 67.60 | Graphics | 1188 |
| Whetstone Benchmark (CPU) | 2.51 | Others | 2077 |
| Memory Benchmark | 372.02 | JPEG | 1672 |
| File system Benchmark | 184.63 | Games | 1670 |
| Storage Cards | - | Sound | 562 |
| Graphics Benchmark | 95.12 | Final | 1433 |
Pocket PC Mark results didn’t change, but VsBenchmark shows an improvement of nearly 40 percent, which is just great! It’s strange, however, that the results of the sound system test have decreased dramatically – I have ran the program again and interestingly it yielded the same results once and the second time it was extremely weak, just like in the benchmark at the preview. I really have no other explanation for this than the non-final ROM.
[+]
Looks cool without a cover
Still, this is not the point, but how does the handset perform during everyday use. I am happy to announce that it’s incredibly good! TouchFLO is like three times as fast than on Diamond, which is due to the screen that has quarter the resolution. The menu system is really lightning fast, although we have to wait quite a lot for the applications to launch, due to the small OMAP CPU. The overall impression is still pleasant. Feast you eyes:
A cikk még nem ért véget, kérlek, lapozz!
