Új hozzászólás Aktív témák

• #14665 ftc nagyúr Balinov #14664

  Új Válasz 2012-12-28 13:21:06 #14665

  Új hozzászólás

  Összes hozzászólása itt Válaszok az összes hozzászólására itt Válaszok erre a hozzászólásra

  Privát üzenet küldése

  

  ftc

  nagyúr

  válasz Balinov #14664 üzenetére

  I use it for bracketing shots, and for its pseudo RAW file format.. It's an half-assed attempt at RAW, it's only 10 bits per channel and not 12 or 14 like DSL's raw files, but it's still much more information - and unprocessed at that - than in the jpeg's 8 bit per channel.

  That means you can, say, under-expose a shot and bring it back up in post-process (or you can do the reverse) depending on what you want to emphasizes, without bringing out the jpeg artifacts.

  Top left is out-of-camera jpeg, top right is LightRoom autotuned jpg
  Bottom is out-of-camera raw and then LightRoom autotuned raw.

  

  However, raw files will be about 10x heavier than jpegs and they won't be cleaned of noise, sharpened, or lens corrected (which will produce harsh vignetting when you're at the widest angle of that SX150 IS (I know, that's the camera I use).

Új hozzászólás Aktív témák