Új hozzászólás Aktív témák

• #3921 polip addikt amol #3918

  Új Válasz 2007-06-09 09:20:18 #3921

  Új hozzászólás

  Összes hozzászólása itt Válaszok az összes hozzászólására itt Válaszok erre a hozzászólásra

  Privát üzenet küldése

  

  polip

  addikt

  válasz amol #3918 üzenetére

  de tudok...
  
  a quadro kártyák nem játékra kitalált dolgok, pláne nem az NVS-ek...az nVidia oldalán szépen le van írogatva melyiket mire javasolják, idézek belőle...
  
  ......''Quadro cards are designed for CAD and business applications, but there are two different types. You have the Quadro FX cards (such as mine), which are designed for 3D CAD applications, and typically perform quite well at games given they are high end cards (the Quadro FX 350M isn't so great). The difference from a Geforce is that the drivers typically have more options a lot of presets for apps such as Solid Works and PRO/E, and they typically have better OpenGL support since most CAD apps use OpenGL rather than DirectX (so OpenGL games like Doom, Quake, and Prey usually scream on my card and dip no lower than 55fps at max settings and high res). They also are typically ISV certified and cost more.
  
  The Quadro NVS on the other hand is geared toward business users. According to nVidia's website, they are designed for ''professional 2D applications.'' They generally aren't meant for gaming and are designed more to provide some 3D acceleration for CAD, but most of the advantages being in clearer picture quality and higher resolutions for multiple monitors and graphics setups. They provide much better color calibration options for photographers than your typical Intel offerings.............''
  
  
  amúgy a 140 sem egy világverő kártya, még egy x1600-as is többet tud nála...1800 pontot tud 3dmark 2006-ban...

  ThinkPad X300 || Samsung Galaxy Nexus - JellyBean

Új hozzászólás Aktív témák